By RUDY!
This May saw many extremes. It began with a cold snap, mid 30s, even snow on my birthday(!), and ended in the near record 90s. Personal life mirrored these extremes. As usual I tried my best to isolate myself from birthday celebrations, but on the other extreme, I also allowed a little bit of mixing between my friend groups, which I am normally vehemently opposed to. Can I explain that last tendency? Should I? I think I learned it by watching an old friend do it. I don’t know if it was ever intentional for this friend to exist in these isolated spheres but it showed me an alternative that left a lasting impression. In adopting it I have discovered its key advantages and disadvantages.
One advantage stems from the fact that I prefer hanging out one on one as opposed to one of many. Isolated social spheres help achieve this desired dynamic by keeping the group small and selective. One major disadvantage is that it can take only one person to dissolve a sphere, which can leave quite the vacuum. Another advantage, the level of openness can vary from one sphere to the next, which is key sense people’s sense of tact and discretion varies in an unpredictable way. However, these levels of openness come with the caveat that you must be aware and cautious of them when crossing spheres. Sigh.
The origin of this tendency may have been learned from observation, but it’s adoption is clearly a result of my desire for control. As terrible as that may sound, it is a bit more nuanced and forgiving. For example, I don’t hate the large group dynamic I am simply self-consciously uncomfortable in it. That is not to say that I am suffering from severe social phobia, I am extremely comfortable when I am the prime focus of a gathering, that is in a one TO many, rather than one OF many dynamic, e.g. I have no difficulty whatsoever delivering a lecture, in fact I exude confidence in such a scenario. But when I lack the undivided attention of the group, I lose my comfort and become extremely self-conscious. Even birthdays, where I am the focus of the gathering but I am not given undivided attention, I become uncomfortable because people can segregate into little spheres, which often leaves me on the edge of these spheres. Being on the edge of a sphere leads to the extreme self-consciousness and the loss of control or ability to alter the scenario without becoming extremely awkward (yes, I know a thing or two about being extremely awkward, but more on that in another digest).
And therein lies the main problem with segregating my friends. Because I’ve chosen to live in these disjointed spheres, any collection of these spheres will inherently lead to segregation, which leaves the one common point, me, isolated! If these spheres were not so disjointed to start with, this problem would not arise. But let’s face it, neither I nor my interests conform to any status quo. In some regard, I do not closely associate with traditions, even when those traditions are on the fringe, i.e. I am a scientist, but I don’t see eye to eye with many scientists, I am not artist, but I love talking to and hanging out with artists, etc. etc. I am simply interested and curious and critical and as such I cannot appease my desire for intelligent communication (in every sense of what communicate means) with one group or type, which perhaps says more about modern American society than anything else. On the other hand, the few individuals that I can satiate my desire for a breath of knowledge and varied interests have dissolved or weakened our sphere (by choice and circumstances), which perhaps says something more about me than anything else.
That all being said, I have begun to relax my constrictions, relaxing my pseudo-contol. And I have made measurable improvements in this aspect, and that is mostly due to recognizing my behavior in others and seeing it carried to an extreme, which was alarming, off-putting, eye-opening. But is the damage done? Is self-recovery impossible? If people never change, as i have said here before, am I simply exchanging one form of control for another? If so, I think this deflection towards self-control is much better than trying to control the behavior of others, so that must be a step forward.