By RUDY!
Some will conclude that the title of this post concerns the contents of the post, they will claim it is self-evident, but for me it seldom is so black and white, in truth, I know precisely what I am referring too and it will never be conferrable in such an imprecise medium and from such an inherently flawed mind. The title is an explicit reference relevant at only a particular space and time. Only I will know this explicit reference… everyone else will have to speculate.
I am thinking about Art and Science. What traits do they share? What traits distinguish them? I think, in my simplistic view and in as few words as possible, that considering what constitutes each will reveal the answers to these questions:
- What constitutes Science? — observation, hypothesis, test (repeat).
- What constitutes Art? — observation, hypothesis, express (try not to repeat).
What do you think?
Additional ruminations that expound the issue:
- the best Science is: clear, strict, beautiful (mathematically), time-tested
- the best Art is: ambiguous, forgiving, beautiful (subjectively), time-tested
Mathematics is a tool, maybe even a medium.
That’s that, but now let’s wade into how my mind works:
I originally set down these considerations when considering the marriage of Religion and Politics in our contemporary America. I was thinking about the danger of such a close relationship, how alienating it can be for those with different beliefs, views, etc., and I started, in my mind, a revolt against the marriage. I launched into eloquent speeches, in my imaginary world, mind you, about the importances of the separation of church and state, the historical precedent that describes the descents such endeavors can lead to, and, as I am wont to do, I took this fancy to the nth degree by postulating what my detractors might say against me. Despite the obvious and empty claims of un-Americanism, they attacked my support of the marriage of Art and Science, and used it to take apart my arguments for the divorce of Religion and Politics. It was effective and I was normalized and defeated. Naturally, this lead me to reconsider my imaginary support for the marriage of Art and Science, so I started thinking about Art and Science.