By RUDY!
I went to see Alain Resnais’ 1961 French film, Last Year at Marienbad, at the Dryden Theatre this Friday and again on Sunday. I had been anxiously waiting for this film to screen after learning it was inspired, or drew from–or some conjecture of that sort–a book by Adolfo Bioy Casares called The Invention of Morel, which I read recently and loved. The similarities can seem slight, but they scream if look for it. In fact, another story by Bioy Casares, Asleep In the Sun, can equally be construed to be influential in Alain Robbe-Grillet’s screen play, as can opening scenes from Bioy Cesares’ A Plan for Escape (which I haven’t finished yet). They all lend some superficial scenes and depictions, but only The Invention of Morel lends the metaphysical conundrum central to the entire film and its many repetitions and representations. But I can’t help but feel that Sadegh Hedayat’s The Blind Owl trumps them all in potential influence.
I believe there is a one-to-one correspondence between The Blind Owl and the screen play of Last Year at Marienbad, both plot and style. (If you haven’t read The Blind Owl, here is a free online version.) The topic of both pieces dwell on memory, real and fake. The line between the real memories and fake memories become blurred beyond recognition. The protagonist undergoes a metamorphosis, there are repeated scenes, phrases, and events throughout both works. Sometimes there are variations in the repetition, like a phrase attributed to one character is next attributed to another, sometimes the repetition is strict. There are deaths (real or fake, we don’t know the whole story, now do we?), and a host of other events that make The Blind Owl and Marienbad more similar than Marienbad and Morel, in my opinion, of course. Then again, I also hold the firm belief that Albert Lamorisse’s 1956 French film The Red Balloon, a seemingly innocuous and playful film about a boy and his red balloon, is a veiled censure of France and the Algerian War, where the color red references either Toussaint Rouge (the start of the Algerian War in 1954) or Main Rouge (Red Hand; terrorist group opposing the Algerian occupation by France). I can overanalyze anything put before my eyes.
Back to Marienbad, if you know the film, you know how non-linear, abstract, and outlandish it can be. Which makes this quotation by screenplay writer Alain Robbe-Grillet all the more puzzling:
We can imagine Marienbad is a documentary on a statue.
Puzzling because we learn in the film that the statue depicts King Charles III (we can only assume of France), his wife, and a dog; a dog that is faced in the opposite direction of the king and queen, as if intentionally avoiding something, or is perhaps trying to call out attention to itself by being turned around (the presence of the dog is another reason I think Asleep in the Sun is an influence). Charles the III also known as Charles the Straightfoward, disposed king, his statue features prominently in a film that seems to be anything but straightforward, or is it? (By the way, I don’t have a reference for the quote, I found it here.)
The most straight forward interpretation is given in the opening scene, where the actors of the film sit and watch a portrayal by two actors in a play. This sets the whole apparatus that is the absurdity of humanity in motion. We, the audience, are shown an audience of motionless figures with eyes glued on the imaginary and staged lives that we and the audience portrayed consider, with aid suspended disbelief, to be true. But the audience’s motionless trance becomes peculiar to us, so much so that we do not pay as much attention to the play as we do to the frozen audience. By this slight of hand, we miss the spoiler, but beyond that, if you stop to think, you realize that you are portrayed there on the screen, you sit motionless with your eyes glued to the screen, and yet you think it is the most peculiar thing when you see others doing it. You see, when we suspend our disbelief, we suspend ourselves, we become momentarily disposed. We, ourselves, are reflected back to us and yet few people make that connection (as indicated by the numerous expositions of the films available on the web, none of which don this notion). We are looking into the mirror and we do not recognize ourselves, which is, in a nutshell, the absurdity of humanity.
Amazing, one could spend years analyzing this film. I went to see it again because I had questions from my first viewing, once I answered them at the second viewing, I found I had even more questions. Unfortunately, the DVD is hard to come by. Region 1 version are going for 200 dollars on Amazon. Region 2 versions seem to be more abundant.